'Quality' is multifaceted. Measuring quality is therefore extremely complex because it means different things to different people. Your definition of quality is likely to be different from that of the parents of the children in your service, and both of yours are likely to be different from the regulatory bodies that inspect your service. In New Zealand, we even have different definitions of quality from the various Te Whāriki theorists!
So measuring and assessing quality is something that needs to be done in partnership — with everyone agreeing on what the goals are first, and then working out how to measure them.
One approach that can be useful in ECE is to use Quality Indicators. These are specific, measurable statements that describe what quality looks like in a particular area of practice. Quality Indicators can be developed collaboratively — by educators, leaders, and even families — and can be used to guide self-review and improvement.
Some examples of Quality Indicators might be:
Quality Indicators work best when they are specific enough to be observable and measurable, and when they are developed collaboratively so that everyone has a shared understanding of what they mean in practice.
Self-review is a process of systematic reflection and inquiry that services use to evaluate and improve their practice. It is a requirement in many regulatory frameworks — including in New Zealand under the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations — and it is also a mark of a learning organisation that is committed to continuous improvement.
Effective self-review involves:
Self-review can feel daunting, particularly for smaller services with limited time and resources. But it doesn't need to be a large, formal process. Even a small, focused inquiry — 'how are we going at greeting children warmly by name?' — can generate valuable insights and meaningful change.
Data can play a valuable role in measuring quality in ECE. This might include:
Tools like Storypark can help services gather and make sense of data about documentation practices, family engagement, and educator activity. This data can be used to identify patterns, celebrate strengths, and target areas for improvement.
External review — whether through regulatory assessment and rating, peer review, or other forms of external evaluation — can provide valuable perspectives that are hard to see from the inside. External reviewers bring fresh eyes, different experiences, and a level of objectivity that internal review can't always achieve.
At the same time, external review is most useful when it is experienced as a collaborative inquiry rather than a compliance exercise. When educators and leaders feel that external reviewers are genuinely interested in understanding and supporting quality — rather than just checking boxes — the process is more likely to generate meaningful insights and improvement.
One of the most powerful things you can do as an ECE leader is to make quality visible — to your team, to families, and to the broader community. This might involve:
When quality is visible, it becomes something that everyone can understand, contribute to, and celebrate. And when it's celebrated, it becomes something worth striving for.
Get practical tips on supporting and enhancing children’s learning by subscribing to our newsletter
Subscribe